To advance and promote the discipline and professional practice of epidemiology in Ontario public health units
Please click here to visit our new website











 

 

 

10 Ontario Health Survey (OHS) - 1996/97 OHS, 1990 OHS

The Ontario Health Survey: 1996/97 & 1990

The 1996/97 Ontario Health Survey
The 1990 Ontario Health Survey
Comparison of the 1990 and 1996/97 Ontario Health Surveys

The 1996/97 Ontario Health Survey (OHS)

Original source:
Statistics Canada
Distributed by:
1. Knowledge Management and Reporting Branch, Ontario MOHLTC
2. Statistics Canada
Suggested citation (see Data Citation Notes):
1. Ontario Health Survey 1996/97, Statistics Canada, Share File, Knowledge Management and Reporting Branch, Ontario MOHLTC
2. Ontario Health Survey 1996/97, Statistics Canada, Public Use Microdata File, Statistics Canada

Data Notes

  • The 1996/97 OHS was conducted from October 1996 to August 1997 in conjunction with the National Population Health Survey (NPHS). The Ontario response rate to the NPHS was 78.8% of households (general survey) with 94.4% of selected individuals subsequently completing the health component. The 1996/97 OHS is comprised of 94.5% of these individuals aged 12+ who agreed to share their information with the province. The Ontario buy-in was conducted using computer-assisted telephone interviewing with sampling by random digit dialing. The buy-in supplemented the core NPHS sample. All health units were sampled and grouped into 23 health areas.
  • The 1996/97 OHS excluded certain groups such as the homeless, aboriginal people on reserves, and those living in institutions.
  • Response rates varied by geographical area.
  • Because of the complex sampling techniques, the 1996/97 OHS requires that sampling weights be used when tabulating data.
  • Estimates with a coefficient of variation greater than 33.3% or based on cell sizes of less than 30 responses must be suppressed. This can be a common occurrence for some areas, particularly when the data are sub-divided by age and sex. Estimates with a CV between 16.6% and 33.3% should be noted as having high sampling variability.
  • Depending upon the question, data may be subject to recall bias, social desirability bias and errors from proxy reporting. Few OHS questions were answered by proxy.
  • The OHS is often the only source for certain types of health data; it covers the general population, and focuses on broad aspects of health, including lifestyle behaviours, health problems, and health care utilization.

References and Resources

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. 1996-97 NPHS: Ontario Health Survey File. Record Layout. April 1999.
  2. Statistics Canada. National Population Health Survey Overview 1996/97. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry, 1998. Catalogue no. 82-567-XPB.

The 1990 Ontario Health Survey (OHS)

Original source:
Ontario Ministry of Health (renamed Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care)
Distributed by: Knowledge Management and Reporting Branch, Ontario MOHLTC
Suggested citation (see Data Citation Notes):
Ontario Health Survey 1990, Ontario MOHLTC

Data Notes

  • The 1990 OHS was conducted from January to November, 1990 (excluding July); the Ontario response rate was 87.5% for the interviewer-completed questionnaire and, of those with an interview, 77.2% returned the self-completed questionnaire. The interviews were face-to-face. All 42 public health units that existed at the time were sampled.
  • The 1990 OHS excluded certain groups such as the homeless, aboriginal people on reserves, and those living in institutions.
  • Response rates varied by geographical area.
  • Because of the complex sampling techniques, the 1990 OHS requires that sampling weights be used when tabulating data.
  • Percentages with a coefficient of variation (CV) greater than 25.0% or based on cell sizes of less than 30 responses must be suppressed. This can be a common occurrence for some areas, particularly when the data are further sub-divided by age and sex. Percentages with a CV greater than 16.6% should be qualified.
  • Depending upon the question, data may be subject to recall bias, social desirability bias and errors from proxy reporting. Few OHS questions were answered by proxy.
  • The OHS is often the only source for certain types of health data; it covers the general population, and focuses on broad aspects of health, including lifestyle behaviours, health problems, and health care utilization.

References and Resources

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Health Survey 1990: Highlights Report. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1991.
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Health Survey 1990: User’s Guide Volume 1, Documentation. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1991.

Comparison of the 1990 and 1996/97 Ontario Health Surveys

 1990 OHS1996/97 OHS
Geographical unit42 areas: public health units23 health areas: health unit groupings
Ontario sample size49,164 (Ages 12+)36,892 (Ages 12+)
Target sample size per area1,000 per PHU1,200 per area
When survey was conductedJanuary-November 1990, excluding JulyOctober 1996 to August 1997
Response ratesHousehold – 87.5%
O5 – 77.2%
Overall – 67.6%
Households – 78.8%
Selected – 94.4%
Sharing – 94.5%
Overall – 70.3%
Methodology and implicationsPersonal face-to-face interview with interviewers completing the household questionnaire (03/04 form) and respondents filling in a self-completed questionnaire (05 form). The O3/O4 was answered by a knowledgeable member of the household on behalf of everyone in the household and the O5 was self-completed by everyone in household. There was higher non-response on the self-completed questionnaire than interview questionnaire. The self-completed questionnaire would have been problematic for those with limited literacy skills, although interviewers did provide assistance if needed.Some personal interview but mostly conducted by telephone using computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). The General File was answered by a knowledgeable member of the household (data only on NPHS, not OHS) and the Health file was completed by interview (mostly telephone) of a randomly-selected individual in household. Random selection resulted in less clustering, lower design effect, and smaller coefficient of variation (c.v.). The CATI format resulted in fewer item non-response, allowed for "up front" edits that reduced error.
Release GuidelinesEstimates with a C.V. of 0 -16.5% can be released with no restriction, C.V. of 16.6 – 25.0% used with qualification, C.V. greater than 25.0% should not used at all.Estimates with a C.V. of 0-16.5% can be released with no restriction, 16.6 - 33.3% used with qualification, C.V. greater than 33.3% should not used at all.
This page last updated: June 7, 2006
Treasurer/Secretary | Admin | Members Login

BrickHost